€6.3 billion in coal subsides undermine innovation needed for energy transition

Ten countries, responsible for 84 per cent of EU energy emissions hand over at least €6.3 billion in subsidies to coal every year, despite repeated promises to phase-out the fuel and transition to clean energy, finds UK thinktank Overseas Development Institute (ODI).

The ODI report, Cutting Europe’s Lifelines to Coal, suggests that Germany, the most transparent in subsidies data, accounts for almost half of the total subsidies looked at, including handing over €2bn in subsidies to coal mining. Italy, the Netherlands, France and Greece have between just two and four subsidies, meaning there is significant potential for them to be coal subsidy-free. Others, including the UK, scored poorly on transparency of coal subsidy reporting.

Head of the Climate and Energy Programme at ODI, Shelagh Whitley, spoke to us about how such practice is undermining renewables investment and innovation in managing energy demand.

Why is a climate ambitious country like Germany still handing out subsidies to coal?

SW: The high number doesn’t necessarily indicate that Germany has the highest subsidies, though it’s likely that they are among the countries with the highest coal subsidies, but because they are so much more transparent than other countries. For instance, Poland may have much higher subsidies than we were able to estimate. Why are governments doing this? You do need to use subsidies for economic transition.

What we would expect is that any coal subsidy should be going to support workers in communities to transition away from coal, but what we found in Europe, is that’s only 14 per cent of the total amount [of coal subsidy] we identified. Governments have, not surprisingly, a vested interest in coal mining and coal-fired power sectors which are, we would argue, demanding unreasonable amounts of support through the transition. [The German government, however, has committed to ending these by 2018, the first in this group of ten European nations.]

The question really is should German taxpayers be paying for that or could the coal companies themselves have been managing the phase out without government support? On coal-fired power you have new subsidies [the report finds six of the ten had introduced €875 million a year in new subsidies since the Paris Agreement] and again, those are often falsely justified because there’s a need for creation of perception of demand for energy that is actually not realistic. This is a call for a need of backup supply when renewables are intermittent, which often is not actually needed.

What is the impact of coal subsidies on renewables development?

SW: What the government should be doing in all cases with these new subsidies meant to deal with the intermittency of renewables, is first look at what the real demand is going to be and if there is enough supply and ability to balance demand to address the challenges. Governments first need to do that assessment properly and that’s not happening. In the UK and other countries there are overestimates of demand. In the UK, the Supplemental Balancing Reserve [the national grid’s string of reserve power stations] paid out £180 million last year [€213 million] to plants that were never even used.

They were being paid because there is an overestimation of the need for them. In Germany there’s an inquiry into a new capacity mechanism right now, specifically on this topic. The commission is saying you don’t need this capacity mechanism because you don’t have proper evidence that this demand is there. We know energy efficiency is accelerating at a really fast pace, which means demand forecasts have to keep up with that. Governments instead are focusing on supply. They’re not focusing where they should be — on demand.

You can deal with a lot of this problem, by having storage, by having efficiencies — demand side management where you power down at times of high demand in other areas. We’re going to need these responsive smart grids and flexible systems as we move to 100 per cent renewables. Rather than investing in that system, they’re investing just in the supply side — and just in the high carbon supply side. It’s not just undermining renewables and clean energy, it’s undermining development and investment in the system that we need to properly manage renewables going forward.

The UK’s capacity mechanism did have an option to give money to demand-side management but it only did that using one-year contracts, whereas coal-fired power plants were given 15-year contracts. If you were a business and you were trying to invest, why would you invest in a demand side management business if you can’t get certainty in revenue, but coal can. It’s not that it just undermines renewables, it undermines the whole energy transition. There are so many different technologies we need on the supply side, the demand side, on the responsiveness of the grid, and on storage.

You’ve talked a bit about how the money could be spent better on demand side energy innovation. Are there any other roles that innovation could play?

SW: It’s about leveling of the playing field. With the grid managers, it’s in their interests to not just pay for supply, but also to pay for reduced demand. There are business models that can be created off the back of that, but what you’re getting is still so much support to these centuries old technologies on the supply side. There needs to be regulatory certainty and long term contracts for the demand side. There’s a lot of focus on wind and solar — supply side renewables but there’s still so much system change that has to happen. There’s so much potential: managing energy demand from your phone, everything becoming digitised; all this needs to happen and that’s what governments need to focus on, rather than supply side technologies.  


With just three years left to meet the EU commitment to end harmful subsidies by 2020, the ODI report recommends European countries end their support for coal under the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme, capacity mechanisms, and in subsidies to biomass power generation. Countries should ensure remaining subsidies are focused on supporting the transition to low-carbon and efficient energy, and support for workers and communities. They should also commit to greater transparency and accountability by undertaking consistent annual reporting of subsidies to coal and fossil fuels. You can read the full report ‘Cutting Europe’s lifelines to coal: tracking subsidies in ten countries’ on the ODI website.

 
Location
Articles you may be interested in
In The News
Bridging the climate adaptation investment gap

Financing climate adaptation took centre-stage at Day 2 of...

Bridging the climate adaptation investment gap
In Detail
Techno-economic assessment and life cycle assessment guidelines for CO2 util...

CO2 utilisation technologies, also known as carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) or CO2 re-use, capture CO2 and convert it into new products or services....

Techno-economic assessment and life cycle assessment guidelines for CO2 utilisation
In The News
Re-Industrialise launches at the European Week of Cities and Regions

EIT Climate-KIC and partners recently launched the Re-Industrialise programme,...

Re-Industrialise launches at the European Week of Cities and Regions
In Detail
Reframing our current approach to urban transformations

EIT Climate-KIC gathered the outputs and lessons-learned from an urban transformations community workshop in Malaga, which saw more than 100 city leaders and teams...

Reframing our current approach to urban transformations
Opinion
Reframing perspectives on climate change
Reframing perspectives on climate change
Opinion
Only 20 companies in the world provide 100 per cent greenhouse gas emissions disclosure – Are ...
Only 20 companies in the world provide 100 per cent greenhouse gas emissions disclosure – Are investors in the dark on climate risks?
In The News
Gaining a better understanding of climate risk

The roadblocks that stand in the way of companies...

Gaining a better understanding of climate risk
In The News
The power of persuasion: Great Debate changes audience’s mind on self-re...

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, Climate...

The power of persuasion: Great Debate changes audience’s mind on self-reporting
In The News
Climate Innovation Summit: a masterclass on climate-related financial disclosu...

If we want to keep on track with the...

Climate Innovation Summit: a masterclass on climate-related financial disclosure
In The News
Transforming financial sector’s core value system may be essential to 1.5C

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, Climate...

Transforming financial sector’s core value system may be essential to 1.5C
In The News
Curbing carbon emissions in company value chains

Most of the world’s largest companies account and report...

Curbing carbon emissions in company value chains
In The News
One hundred 1.5C compatible investments by 2030

New investor framework launched today at European Climate Innovation...

One hundred 1.5C compatible investments by 2030
In The News
‘Fearless Girl’ appears at EIT Climate-KIC’s Climate Innovation Summit

Fearless Girl—the famous bronze statue erected in Lower Manhattan...

‘Fearless Girl’ appears at EIT Climate-KIC’s Climate Innovation Summit
In our community
Interview with Leeor Groen, Venture Manager, Blockchain Valley Ventures
Interview with Leeor Groen, Venture Manager, Blockchain Valley Ventures
In The News
EIT Climate-KIC partners with South Pole for Climate Innovation Summit carbon ...

EIT Climate-KIC’s Climate Innovation Summit (CIS) will feature a...

EIT Climate-KIC partners with South Pole for Climate Innovation Summit carbon offsetting programme
In The News
Financing tomorrow’s new normal today

First published in Environmental Finance as part of a joint...

Financing tomorrow’s new normal today
In The News
Climathon 2018 will be the biggest global climate hackathon in history

Over 100 cities from around the world will join...

Climathon 2018 will be the biggest global climate hackathon in history
Opinion
How can we mainstream major climate risks into financial reporting?
Hanna Värttö Senior Consultant, South Pole Group
How can we mainstream major climate risks into financial reporting?
In The News
EIT Climate-KIC emphasises need for climate focus in cohesion policy at Europe...

EIT Climate-KIC was among the urban planners, municipalities, policy...

EIT Climate-KIC emphasises need for climate focus in cohesion policy at European Week of Cities and Regions
In The News
EIT Climate-KIC’s secrets for successfully running accelerators revealed...

EIT Climate-KIC has been featured in “Accelerate This!”, a...

EIT Climate-KIC’s secrets for successfully running accelerators revealed in “Accelerate This!”
Opinion
Harvesting the intelligence of photosynthetic microalgae to de-carbonise future cities
Marco Poletto Co-founder and Director, ecoLogicStudio
Harvesting the intelligence of photosynthetic microalgae to de-carbonise future cities
In our community
Interview with Mariana Mazzucato, Professor, Economics of Innovation and Pub...
Interview with Mariana Mazzucato, Professor, Economics of Innovation and Public Value, UCL
In The News
Why we invest in sustainable start-ups

A growing number of investors recognise the value in...

Why we invest in sustainable start-ups
In Detail
EIT Climate-KIC position paper: EU long-term GHG emissions reduction strateg...

As an active member of the community working to solve challenges presented by climate change, EIT Climate-KIC has published a position paper on the...

EIT Climate-KIC position paper: EU long-term GHG emissions reduction strategy
In The News
EIT Climate-KIC to partner Project X pilot to boost sustainability in global f...

EIT Climate-KIC is co-funding a pilot project, Feed-X, which...

EIT Climate-KIC to partner Project X pilot to boost sustainability in global feed production
Opinion
Learning out loud
Kirsten Dunlop Chief Executive Officer, EIT Climate-KIC
Learning out loud
In The News
No more excuses: Financing 1.5C

First published in Environmental Finance as part of a series covering...

No more excuses: Financing 1.5C
Opinion
Do we need an IPCC special report for humans?
Scott Williams Director of Decision Metrics and Finance
Do we need an IPCC special report for humans?
Opinion
Investor framework launched for 1.5C-compatible investments
Dennis Pamlin Entrepreneur and Founder of 21st Century Frontiers
Investor framework launched for 1.5C-compatible investments
In The News
Teams announced for final stage of Reinventing Cities competition

The teams selected to go through to the final...

Teams announced for final stage of Reinventing Cities competition