€6.3 billion in coal subsides undermine innovation needed for energy transition

Ten countries, responsible for 84 per cent of EU energy emissions hand over at least €6.3 billion in subsidies to coal every year, despite repeated promises to phase-out the fuel and transition to clean energy, finds UK thinktank Overseas Development Institute (ODI).

The ODI report, Cutting Europe’s Lifelines to Coal, suggests that Germany, the most transparent in subsidies data, accounts for almost half of the total subsidies looked at, including handing over €2bn in subsidies to coal mining. Italy, the Netherlands, France and Greece have between just two and four subsidies, meaning there is significant potential for them to be coal subsidy-free. Others, including the UK, scored poorly on transparency of coal subsidy reporting.

Head of the Climate and Energy Programme at ODI, Shelagh Whitley, spoke to us about how such practice is undermining renewables investment and innovation in managing energy demand.

Why is a climate ambitious country like Germany still handing out subsidies to coal?

SW: The high number doesn’t necessarily indicate that Germany has the highest subsidies, though it’s likely that they are among the countries with the highest coal subsidies, but because they are so much more transparent than other countries. For instance, Poland may have much higher subsidies than we were able to estimate. Why are governments doing this? You do need to use subsidies for economic transition.

What we would expect is that any coal subsidy should be going to support workers in communities to transition away from coal, but what we found in Europe, is that’s only 14 per cent of the total amount [of coal subsidy] we identified. Governments have, not surprisingly, a vested interest in coal mining and coal-fired power sectors which are, we would argue, demanding unreasonable amounts of support through the transition. [The German government, however, has committed to ending these by 2018, the first in this group of ten European nations.]

The question really is should German taxpayers be paying for that or could the coal companies themselves have been managing the phase out without government support? On coal-fired power you have new subsidies [the report finds six of the ten had introduced €875 million a year in new subsidies since the Paris Agreement] and again, those are often falsely justified because there’s a need for creation of perception of demand for energy that is actually not realistic. This is a call for a need of backup supply when renewables are intermittent, which often is not actually needed.

What is the impact of coal subsidies on renewables development?

SW: What the government should be doing in all cases with these new subsidies meant to deal with the intermittency of renewables, is first look at what the real demand is going to be and if there is enough supply and ability to balance demand to address the challenges. Governments first need to do that assessment properly and that’s not happening. In the UK and other countries there are overestimates of demand. In the UK, the Supplemental Balancing Reserve [the national grid’s string of reserve power stations] paid out £180 million last year [€213 million] to plants that were never even used.

They were being paid because there is an overestimation of the need for them. In Germany there’s an inquiry into a new capacity mechanism right now, specifically on this topic. The commission is saying you don’t need this capacity mechanism because you don’t have proper evidence that this demand is there. We know energy efficiency is accelerating at a really fast pace, which means demand forecasts have to keep up with that. Governments instead are focusing on supply. They’re not focusing where they should be — on demand.

You can deal with a lot of this problem, by having storage, by having efficiencies — demand side management where you power down at times of high demand in other areas. We’re going to need these responsive smart grids and flexible systems as we move to 100 per cent renewables. Rather than investing in that system, they’re investing just in the supply side — and just in the high carbon supply side. It’s not just undermining renewables and clean energy, it’s undermining development and investment in the system that we need to properly manage renewables going forward.

The UK’s capacity mechanism did have an option to give money to demand-side management but it only did that using one-year contracts, whereas coal-fired power plants were given 15-year contracts. If you were a business and you were trying to invest, why would you invest in a demand side management business if you can’t get certainty in revenue, but coal can. It’s not that it just undermines renewables, it undermines the whole energy transition. There are so many different technologies we need on the supply side, the demand side, on the responsiveness of the grid, and on storage.

You’ve talked a bit about how the money could be spent better on demand side energy innovation. Are there any other roles that innovation could play?

SW: It’s about leveling of the playing field. With the grid managers, it’s in their interests to not just pay for supply, but also to pay for reduced demand. There are business models that can be created off the back of that, but what you’re getting is still so much support to these centuries old technologies on the supply side. There needs to be regulatory certainty and long term contracts for the demand side. There’s a lot of focus on wind and solar — supply side renewables but there’s still so much system change that has to happen. There’s so much potential: managing energy demand from your phone, everything becoming digitised; all this needs to happen and that’s what governments need to focus on, rather than supply side technologies.  


With just three years left to meet the EU commitment to end harmful subsidies by 2020, the ODI report recommends European countries end their support for coal under the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme, capacity mechanisms, and in subsidies to biomass power generation. Countries should ensure remaining subsidies are focused on supporting the transition to low-carbon and efficient energy, and support for workers and communities. They should also commit to greater transparency and accountability by undertaking consistent annual reporting of subsidies to coal and fossil fuels. You can read the full report ‘Cutting Europe’s lifelines to coal: tracking subsidies in ten countries’ on the ODI website.

 
Location
Articles you may be interested in
In Detail
Municipality-led circular economy case studies from EIT Climate-KIC and part...

How can cities create prosperity for expanding populations whose rates of consumption are increasing, while strengthening the systemic change that supports waste and resource management?...

Municipality-led circular economy case studies from EIT Climate-KIC and partners
In Detail
Transformative change through innovation: An analysis of the role of innovat...

One of the areas with significant potential to reduce carbon emissions is the energy sector, including the transition away from coal. It is, and...

Transformative change through innovation: An analysis of the role of innovation in five transition regions
In The News
COP24 report: The vital role of land use in climate mitigation

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, key...

COP24 report: The vital role of land use in climate mitigation
In The News
COP24: Distributed ledger technology could help enact Paris Agreement

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, key...

COP24: Distributed ledger technology could help enact Paris Agreement
Opinion
System innovation is needed to help regions shift to a low-carbon economy
System innovation is needed to help regions shift to a low-carbon economy
In The News
COP24: Social innovation to drive just transition of coal regions

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, key...

COP24: Social innovation to drive just transition of coal regions
In Detail
DLT for climate action assessment

DOWNLOAD THE REPORT Over the past decade, we’ve witnessed a myriad of milestones that have put the vision of a prosperous, climate-resilient society on...

DLT for climate action assessment
In The News
EIT Climate-KIC’s ConnectedClusters launches at EUROCITIES

EIT Climate-KIC’s ConnectedClusters project—which aims to accelerate innovation clusters...

EIT Climate-KIC’s ConnectedClusters launches at EUROCITIES
Opinion
St. Patrick is on a Mission – #MissionFinance 1.5 C
Sandra Vlašić, Partnerships, Resources and Stories Terra Hub
St. Patrick is on a Mission – #MissionFinance 1.5 C
In our community
EIT Climate-KIC to showcase its top 30 cleantech startups during Slush 2018
EIT Climate-KIC to showcase its top 30 cleantech startups during Slush 2018
In The News
How to unlock the finance needed for integrated landscape approaches

Why integrated landscape approaches matter and how to unlock...

How to unlock the finance needed for integrated landscape approaches
In The News
Regional Innovation Scheme start-ups showcase cleantech achievements supported...

Last month (October 2018) in Vienna, Austria, 32 start-ups...

Regional Innovation Scheme start-ups showcase cleantech achievements supported by EIT Climate-KIC
In The News
City Finance Lab explores new advisory services to catalyse investment in sust...

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, Climate...

City Finance Lab explores new advisory services to catalyse investment in sustainable cities
In The News
EIT Climate-KIC responds to consultation on Long-Term Strategy for EU GHG emis...

As an active member of the community working to...

EIT Climate-KIC responds to consultation on Long-Term Strategy for EU GHG emissions reduction
Opinion
Distributed ledger technologies are here to stay
Dr. Harald Rauter Regional Innovation Lead, Climate-KIC
Distributed ledger technologies are here to stay
In The News
Search for 100 1.5C-compatible investments launched

The EU-backed Mission Innovation initiative has launched a framework...

Search for 100 1.5C-compatible investments launched
In The News
Can self-reporting be effective for investors?

Most climate and ESG data is self-reported – can...

Can self-reporting be effective for investors?
In The News
Risky business: Why 1.5C-aligned strategies are key to preserving capital

Decision-makers with responsibility for capital need to make bold,...

Risky business: Why 1.5C-aligned strategies are key to preserving capital
In The News
No alternative: Making sustainable infrastructure the only option

Only a fraction of global climate finance is reaching...

No alternative: Making sustainable infrastructure the only option
In The News
Could ambitious financial regulation be a key driver of climate action?

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, Climate...

Could ambitious financial regulation be a key driver of climate action?
In The News
Bridging the climate adaptation investment gap

Financing climate adaptation took centre-stage at Day 2 of...

Bridging the climate adaptation investment gap
In Detail
Techno-economic assessment and life cycle assessment guidelines for CO2 util...

CO2 utilisation technologies, also known as carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) or CO2 re-use, capture CO2 and convert it into new products or services....

Techno-economic assessment and life cycle assessment guidelines for CO2 utilisation
In The News
Re-Industrialise launches at the European Week of Cities and Regions

EIT Climate-KIC and partners recently launched the Re-Industrialise programme,...

Re-Industrialise launches at the European Week of Cities and Regions
In Detail
Reframing our current approach to urban transformations

EIT Climate-KIC gathered the outputs and lessons-learned from an urban transformations community workshop in Malaga, which saw more than 100 city leaders and teams...

Reframing our current approach to urban transformations
Opinion
Reframing perspectives on climate change
Reframing perspectives on climate change
Opinion
Only 20 companies in the world provide 100 per cent greenhouse gas emissions disclosure – Are ...
Only 20 companies in the world provide 100 per cent greenhouse gas emissions disclosure – Are investors in the dark on climate risks?
In The News
Gaining a better understanding of climate risk

The roadblocks that stand in the way of companies...

Gaining a better understanding of climate risk
In The News
The power of persuasion: Great Debate changes audience’s mind on self-re...

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, Climate...

The power of persuasion: Great Debate changes audience’s mind on self-reporting
In The News
A masterclass on climate-related financial disclosure

If we want to keep on track with the...

A masterclass on climate-related financial disclosure
In The News
Transforming financial sector’s core value system may be essential to 1.5C

With the carbon costs of travel in mind, Climate...

Transforming financial sector’s core value system may be essential to 1.5C